Her proposed legislation (which she still supports) considered fines of the following for sale of an adult oriented (there are no specifics as to what is "adult"):
On-site store managers would be subject to a fine of $1,000 or 100 hours of community service for the first offense and $5,000 or 500 hours of community service for each subsequent offense.
Note that in the state of California, where I live, the penalty for sale of alchohol to a minor on the part of the store operator is:
Sale to minors: maximum penalty of $250 and/or 24-32 hours Community Service
So the accepted penalty for the sale of a known, proven neuro toxin to minors is trivial compared to the sale of interactive content that has never, after extensive studies, been shown to exhibit a positive correlation between violence in content to violence in behavior.
FYI I am not a republican; I reject both parties as pathetic attempts at religion under the pretense of political ideology. I believe there should be a no party system with candidates chosen based on their belief and support in issues. This issue in particular I believe strongly in, that individuals should be left to decide for themselves, that books, games, movies, poems, or any form of human expression should not be idly censored "for the children", and that one of the reasons we are losing our ability to see from right from wrong in a cultural and social sense is we have surrended control of the concepts to the government.
Freedom of expression is a fundamental right that should be protected at all costs. For this reason alone, if you are considering supporting Senator Clinton, I urge you to reconsider. There are many issues she and I agree on, but this is one I cannot stomach in an elected official. I am in control of my moral destiny and that of my children, not a politician.
-Remagi
